Inside Man (2006) Movie Review

Spike Lee’s Inside Man has an A-list cast that includes Denzel Washington, Clive Owen, and Jodie Foster. I watched the movie a few years ago and revisited it last night. Spike Lee has assembled an excellent heist thriller that keeps you guessing until the very end, with outstanding performances across the board helping to propel the story in unexpected directions. While not perfect, Inside Man proved a thoroughly entertaining experience that had me engrossed from start to finish.

The film wastes no time grabbing your attention, immediately thrusting us into the middle of a meticulously planned bank robbery. We’re introduced to Dalton Russell, played with calculating cunning by Clive Owen, as he takes control of the bank with his team and secures the hostages. Right from these opening scenes, it’s evident we’re in the hands of a criminal mastermind, with every detail of the heist painstakingly orchestrated. Lee films the robbery with palpable tension, excellently putting us in the hostage’s shoes as the stakes rapidly escalate. We also get glimpses of Russell through interrogation scenes that flash forward, hinting there’s much more below the surface than a simple bank job.

In this volatile scenario, Denzel Washington’s Detective Keith Frazier is inserted as hostage negotiator. From the moment he takes charge outside the bank, Washington owns the role with his inimitable screen presence and unrelenting focus. He immediately butts heads with the situation’s complexity and Russell’s unpredictability, refusing to conform to routine hostage negotiation. I loved watching the battle of wits between these two adversaries, with neither controlling the other. The casting of Denzel Washington and Clive Owen could not have been more perfect, their charismatic interplay constantly keeping you guessing the other’s intentions.

While the main thrust deals with Frazier and Russell’s chess match, Spike Lee shrewdly drops in additional mysteries and characters to continually deepen the narrative. Chief among these is Jodie Foster’s Madeline White, a rich and enigmatic woman with unknown motivations for being involved. Foster imbues White with icy calculation and ambiguity, posing as many questions as she answers. Her connection to Christopher Plummer’s shady bank president is another layer of intrigue that proves pivotal by the film’s climax. Elsewhere, supporting turns from the likes of Willem Dafoe and Chiwetel Ejiofor add color and fun without distracting from the central story.

One of the aspects I most admired was Spike Lee’s inventive storytelling device of intercutting between the unfolding hostage crisis and interrogation scenes that reveal clues piece by piece. Rather than playing things straight, he mixes chronology to keep you permanently off balance, just like the characters. While some have criticized this as convoluting the narrative, I felt it maintained vital momentum and suspense. Major plot points are never fully spelled out, trusting the audience to join the dots, and this ambiguity serves the mystery well throughout. Lee seeded so many possibilities that I constantly questioned what was happening, which characters’ agendas were truly altruistic, and how they might conclude. This made for a highly unpredictable and engaging viewing experience.

Perhaps my greatest praise is reserved for how satisfying everything comes together by the climax. When all is revealed, almost every minor detail and dropped breadcrumb falls neatly into place, and the full scope of Russell’s plan is laid bare. It’s a testament to Spike Lee’s intricate construction that very few, if any, loose plot threads are left dangling. The payoff genuinely surprised me and left me in awe of the narrative intricacy. This dense and layered conclusion is beautifully executed for a story and brings a satisfying closure to the many mysteries introduced earlier. I also appreciated that there were no easy heroes or villains – the moral lines remained blurry until the end.

My only real criticism is that Lee may have sacrificed some characterization for the sake of the plot. While the major players are fully realized, some secondary roles feel less developed or exist more as cogs in the machine. It’s a negligible flaw, given how skillfully the screenplay juggles countless moving parts until its stunning revelation of the method behind the madness. Technical aspects like cinematography and soundtrack are uniformly superb, too, with Spike Lee putting his signature artistic flair to perfect use, enhancing the proceedings.

Ultimately, Inside Man achieved what it set out to do – deliver an exciting, unpredictably twist-filled thriller that amazes you with its architecture. It aims remarkably high for a crowd-pleasing genre picture and largely sticks to its ambitious landing. Inhaling it in one sitting, I was once again enthralled from beginning to end as the mysteries of Inside Man unraveled fascinatingly.

It’s an extremely well-oiled machine that operates like a finely tuned clock. It is not just one of Spike Lee’s strongest works but a modern heist classic that will satisfy any crime thriller fan. While not quite perfect, Inside Man gets just about everything else right and proves a supremely entertaining ride from start to brilliant finish. I’d highly recommend adding it to your must-watch list.

Movie Rating: 4/5
Note: 3 is the median. Anything above 3 is a recommended watch.

Written by MighilMighil is an indie musician and tinkerer with diverse work experience in technology and writing. He has had the privilege of serving in various capacities, encompassing generalist and specialist roles. He is currently based in Chengdu.


Opt-in to receive long-form essays in your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime. Follow me on 𝕏 if you like.

Powered by DigitalOcean, BunnyCDN, WordPress.